Bus Trip to Harrisburg for Campaign For Compassion Rally


Pittsburgh Norml and the Pittsburgh Norml Women’s Alliance are happy to be chartering a luxury bus to this event:

Tuesday, September 22  at 5:00am

Campaign for Compassion will be hosting a rally and press conference outside of the Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg. Please save the date! We want to pack the grounds and send a powerful message to the General Assembly and their Leadership that we want action on SB3, the Compassionate Use of Cannabis Act, immediately! What better time to send that message than their first day back in session?

We are taking a bus load of people with us and space is limited to 40 tickets! Here’s what you get:

-Guaranteed seating on our coach that is equipped with reclining seats, air conditioning, restroom, DVD, P.A. system, radio, Wi-Fi, and underneath and overhead luggage area.
-Membership and a T-shirt from Pittsburgh Norml
-Complimentary box breakfast

Ticket links:



or you can call rastafarIsaac at 4128776947 and he can take your credit card info over the phone and secure your reservation.

You can also buy tickets to Donate to others who can’t afford to go. Just put Donate tickets in the payment comments box.

Tickets are $50 and only 40 are available. Get them now. We need our people to put their money where their mouth is and buy tickets!!! And we MUST make a day of lobbying out of this since we won’t be having a Committee hearing to attend . . .

If you think that ticket price is high just remember what it would cost for you and a friend to drive out there with gas and tolls etc. This is a very fair price!

Pick Up location

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AT PARKWAY CENTER MALL . 875 Greentree Road Pittsburgh, PA 15220 bus leaves at 5am Sharp

Please join us and SHARE SHARE SHARE


Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Blocked by Rep. Matt Baker thedailychronic.net

HARRISBURG, PA – A bill decisively passed by the Pennsylvania Senate to allow medical marijuana in the state could be stalled indefinitely if a key lawmaker in the House has his way.

Rep. Matt Baker (R-Tioga County), Chair of the House Health Committee, said Friday that he has no intention of allowing his committee to take up the Senate’s medical marijuana bill – or any other bill to allow marijuana for medical purposes.

“It is not likely that this bill will be taken up in the foreseeable future at this point in time,” Baker said Friday.

Rep. Matt Baker

Unfortunately for those Pennsylvanians suffering from cancer, epilepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder, or a dozen other qualifying conditions, the Senate approved medical marijuana bill, Senate Bill 3 has been assigned to Rep. Baker’s committee in the Pennsylvania House, where a similar bill died last year after also receiving Senate approval despite there being multiple states who have legalized the use of medical marijuana and there are already illinois marijuana doctors prescribing it. However, if you live in a State where you can legally have medical marijuana then that’s great. A lot more States are being more positive about marijuana, as they are understanding it and the benefits it can people better. If you are thinking that medical marijuana might help you then you might be interested in taking a look at something like this ohio marijuana registration form to get you started on being able to take medical marijuana.

Senate Bill 3, bipartisan legislation spearheaded by Senators Daylin Leach (D-Montgomery County) and Mike Folmer (R-Lebanon County), was decisively passed on Tuesday by the Senate by a 40-7 vote. The bill would have created a comprehensive, tightly regulated medical marijuana program in the state.

Despite overwhelming support from both the Pennsylvania Senate and high polling among Pennsylvania voters – polls show legalizing medical marijuana has the support of upwards of 88% of Keystone State voters – it seems that Rep. Matt Baker may single-handedly prevented access to medical marijuana for his constituents.

Baker said he was “very disappointed” that the Senate voted to approve the medical marijuana bill, even though the bill was tightly regulated and would have banned smoking and edible sales as it could be helpful for those who want to buy edibles online to help with their medical issues and only would have allowed vaporization for a few pre-approved conditions.

“It is amazing when you consider the strong opposition of the expert medical and scientific community that appeared to be ignored,” Baker said, adding that the only drugs that should be allowed in the Commonwealth are those that are authorized through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval process.

According to Rep. Baker, one of the main reasons to not advance Senate Bill 3 is because cannabis is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That, however, did not stop Rep. Baker from accepting campaign contributions from multiple pharmaceutical companies who have combined to pay over $1 billion to settle charges that they were marketing drugs for uses not approved by the FDA.

The proposed bill would limit the use of medical marijuana to patients suffering from 15 specific conditions: cancer; epilepsy and seizures; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); cachexia/wasting syndrome; Parkinson’s disease; traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-concussion syndrome; multiple sclerosis; spinocerebellara ataxia (SCA); post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); severe fibromyalgia; HIV/AIDS; glaucoma; Chron’s disease; diabetes; and chronic pain “where other methods of treatment no longer have therapeutic or palliative benefit.”

It may – or may not – come as a surprise to see that the majority of reported campaign contributions come from companies that manufacture drugs that treat many of those qualifying conditions.

Public campaign finance records show significant contributions from pharmaceutical companies that could potentially profit from the continued prohibition of plant-derived medicine. Most of the pharmaceutical companies that contributed to Baker’s election campaigns manufacture or market drugs that treat conditions that would be eligible for the medical marijuana program proposed in Senate Bill 3.

When breaking down campaign contributions by industry, the pharmaceutical and healthcare product industry made up the largest percentage of reported contributions, totaling $32,800. When looking at individual contributions, Baker received several notable campaign contributions from pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies and drug wholesalers, totaling over $37,000:

AstraZeneca $6,800
Abbott Laboratories $3,500
Value Drug $3,450
Johnson & Johnson $3,400
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. $3,000
Hoffmann-La Roche $2,500
Sanofi US $2,500
Pfizer $2,250
Novartis $1,800
Merck & Co $1,750
GlaxoSmithKline $1,500
CVS Caremark $1,000
Eli Lilly and Company $1,000
Rite Aid $1,000
Endo Pharmaceuticals $1,000
AbbVie, Inc $1,000

Among Baker’s 2014 campaign contributors is Value Drug, Inc, a Pennsylvania based drug wholesaler that agreed in June 2014 to pay $4 million to resolve allegations that it violated the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) by failing to report suspicious orders of oxycodone to six pharmacies located in Maryland and Pennsylvania.

Also among Baker’s contributors is Abbot Laboratories, who agreed to pay at least $1.3 billion in 2011 for illegally marketing its Depakote epilepsy drug to the U.S. government and 24 states. Abbot Laboratories was also under fire in 2012, when the company plead guilty and agreed to pay a $500 million fine and $198.5 million forfeiture for illegal marketing, and in a plea agreement was assessed the second-largest criminal fine in U.S. history for a drug company. That punishment was related to the company’s unlawful promotion of the prescription drug Depakote for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Depakote had only been approved by the FDA for three uses –epileptic seizures, bipolar mania and the prevention of migraines – but Abbot Laboratories marketed the drug as a treatment for psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Then there is Medco Health Solutions, a pharmacy benefit management company that was fined $155 million in 2006 for accepting kickbacks from pharmaceutical manufacturers to favor their drugs, and paid kickbacks to health plans to obtain business.

And let’s not forget about Hoffmann-La Roche, who paid $500 million in criminal fines in 1999 after pleading guilty to participation in a worldwide conspiracy to raise and fix prices on vitamins sold in the United States and other countries.

Or AstraZeneca, who makes several drugs to combat cancer, diabetes and other conditions covered under the proposed medical marijuana bill. AstraZeneca paid $520 million in 2010 to settle allegations that they illegally marketed the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration.

Seroquel is an atypical antipsychotic used to treat symptoms of schizophrenia. The medication is also sometimes used to treat symptoms of bipolar disorder. All medicines can cause side effects, particularly if they are not used as advised. Correspondingly, the biggest disadvantage of Seroquel is the potential for long-term side effects. Furthermore, Seroquel Withdrawal can also be difficult to combat. For further information about Seroquel and drug rehab head to alternativetomeds.com.

And finally, there is AbbVie, Inc, who markets Marinol, a prescription pill that is made of synthetic THC and is used to help stimulate the appetite of AIDS patients. Marinol is the only US FDA-approved synthetic cannabinoid, and is often marketed as a legal pharmaceutical alternative to natural cannabis, according to NORML.

There are also significant campaign contributions from major pharmacy chains CVS and Rite Aid, neither of whom would be permitted under Senate Bill 3 to distribute medical marijuana.

Rep. Baker represents Pennsylvania’s 68th House District, which, according to the 2010 census, is home to 59,039 residents. That represents only .46% – less than half a percent – of Pennsylvania’s total population of 12,702,884.

So what is next for the future of medical marijuana in Pennsylvania?

“The fight to bring even a limited medicinal cannabis program to Pennsylvania is far from over,” says Patrick K. Nightingale, Esq., Executive Director of Pittsburgh NORML. “It seems incredible to activists, patients and supporters that medicinal cannabis enjoys 88% support here in the Commonwealth but the future of a medicinal cannabis bill remains uncertain.”

“It should also come as no surprise to activists and patients alike that Chairman Baker takes his marching orders from the pharmaceutical industry, as they have been his primary donors,” Nightingale says. “No wonder Chairman Baker has the audacity to counsel the parents of severely epileptic children to simply wait for GW Pharmaceuticals to come to the rescue with an anti-seizure drug in 2017.”

“Now we are tasked with the challenge of moving legislation forward in a committee system that all but guarantees that one man can thwart the will of 88% of Pennsylvanians who support medicinal cannabis,” Nightingale added.

Activists are already planning lobbying efforts in Harrisburg, aimed at persuading Rep. Baker to take action on Senate Bill 3.

“He does not yet understand the political weight and pressure we are about to bring down on him.” says Les Stark of the Keystone Cannabis Coalition. “It’s easier to turn up the heat on one man than the entire General Assembly.”

“It’s going to be a wild ride,” Stark added.

For Pennsylvania residents wishing to contact Rep. Baker, his official contact information is as follows:

Capitol Office
213 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202068
Harrisburg, PA 17120-2068
Phone: 717-772-5371
Fax: 717-705-1850
TTY: 855-282-0614

E-mail: mbaker@pahousegop.com

Facebook: Facebook.com/RepBaker

© All rights reserved. This article originally appeared on The Daily Chronic and is used here with permission under a joint partnership agreement between Pittsburgh NORML and The Daily Chronic. This content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Click here for more information.

Read the original post of this article on The Daily Chronic


Scott Gacek A long time marijuana reform activist from Boston, Scott Gacek served on the Board of Directors of MassCann/NORML from 2009-2011. Since then, he has worked with several grassroots reform organizations around the country, including Bay State Repeal in Massachusetts and NORML chapters in Pennsylvania.

Sick Pennsylvanians at the mercy of the Pennsylvanian House with Senate Bill 3.


The Pennsylvania Senate is poised to once again pass a medicinal cannabis bill. Senate Bill 3, essentially a mirror of the bill that passed 43 – 7 in the last legislative session, could be voted on as early as today. Prime sponsors Sen. Mike Folmer (R-Lebanon) and Sen. Daylin Leach (D-Bucks) are confident of passage. The bill will then proceed to the House.

Senate Bill 3 would establish a regulatory scheme through which licenses to grow, process and dispense medicinal cannabis would be established allowing people that are well-versed in cannabis cultivation and selling to find legal Cannabis Jobs in a dispensary or grow-operations for medical marijuana products, etc. Patients with “qualifying conditions” would be permitted to apply for a medicinal cannabis card upon the recommendation of their physician, provided the condition is one of the approved conditions on the list as set forth in the bill.

The bill remains very limited in scope, restricting qualifying conditions to a list of 15 that includes seizure disorder, cancer, HIV/AIDS, chronic pain, PTSD, Diabetes and ALS. Eligible patients may receive a medical cannabis recommendation from their treating physician and then purchase medicinal cannabis products from a licensed medicinal cannabis dispensary. An advisory board to be formed may add qualifying conditions, but not until July, 2017. Are you looking to get in the business? Do you want to know what does it take to open a dispensary? Check out the article for more information.

Senate Bill 3 also restricts the manner in which a patient may both purchase and consume medicinal cannabis. Vaporization, one of the safest and most effective means of medicinal cannabinoid delivery, is restricted to three conditions – seizures, cancer treatment and PTSD, and must be specifically recommended by a physician. Further, the method of vaporization must be specifically authorized by the Board. Gone is the nonsensical “nebulizer”. The Bill also prohibits medicinal edible cannabis products, though it permits a patient to produce edible cannabis products at home.

The effort to pass a medicinal cannabis bill now turns to the House of Representatives where it faces an uncertain future. If the House hearings convened by Health Committee Chair Matt Baker are any indication, some in the House continue to believe cannabis has no medical efficacy, that it lacks scientific and medical evidence, and that Pennsylvania must wait for FDA approval. Rep. Baker, for his part, remains an immovable force urging parents with critically ill children to simply wait for pharmaceutical companies to develop new drugs.

It seems incredible to activists, patients and supporters that medicinal cannabis enjoys 88% support here in the Commonwealth but the future of a medicinal cannabis bill remains uncertain. Were Governor Wolf to sign the legislation today patients would still face a two to three year wait before a single gram of PA produced and distributed medicinal cannabis was available for purchase, even with businesses investing in cannabis pos systems to track the growth to sale exactly. The cruel irony is that medicinal cannabis products are already available in twenty-three other states. Children with intractable epilepsy in Michigan can treat with medicinal cannabis oil, while children in PA must continue to wait.

The fight to bring even a limited medicinal cannabis program to Pennsylvania is far from over. Whilst in other areas they already have access to resources like bakedlink.com to help set up dispensaries, we are lagging behind. Senate Bill 3 now moves to the House where its future is far from certain. Will the House cave to “refer madness” scaremongering and further restrict the legislation? Could it even die in Committee? Will back-door maneuvering further delay implementation of a medicinal program? Can Pennsylvanians afford to just wait and wait when relief is available a zip code or two away?
Patrick K. Nightingale, Esquire
Executive Director
Pittsburgh NORML